Related
benstpierre： I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wit
benstpierre： I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wit
kaylil_01： Sonar-linter thinks the correct way to inject is: @Bean
public Example example(DataSource datasource) {
return new Example(datasource)
}
But if only one method is using this field. I'm curious, why is there only one way? Maybe @Autowired is bett
kaylil_01： Sonar-linter thinks the correct way to inject is: @Bean
public Example example(DataSource datasource) {
return new Example(datasource)
}
But if only one method is using this field. I'm curious, why is there only one way? Maybe @Autowired is bett
mkjeldsen ： The following Spring bean declaration appears to work and behave "as expected": @Configuration
public class AppConfig {
private final Foo foo;
public AppConfig() {
foo = new Foo();
}
@Bean
public Foo foo() {
r
mkjeldsen ： The following Spring bean declaration appears to work and behave "as expected": @Configuration
public class AppConfig {
private final Foo foo;
public AppConfig() {
foo = new Foo();
}
@Bean
public Foo foo() {
r
mkjeldsen ： The following Spring bean declaration appears to work and behave "as expected": @Configuration
public class AppConfig {
private final Foo foo;
public AppConfig() {
foo = new Foo();
}
@Bean
public Foo foo() {
r
mkjeldsen ： The following Spring bean declaration appears to work and behave "as expected": @Configuration
public class AppConfig {
private final Foo foo;
public AppConfig() {
foo = new Foo();
}
@Bean
public Foo foo() {
r
Nason: I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the c
Nason I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the co
Nason I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the co
Nason: I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the c
iceberg When developing new classes/methods for a Java project, sometimes you want people to try out your new code, but don't want to guarantee that it will be backward compatible in future releases. In this case, use something like the @Unstable annotation to
iceberg When developing new classes/methods for a Java project, sometimes you want people to try out your new code, but don't want to guarantee that it will be backward compatible in future releases. In this case, use something like the @Unstable annotation to
iceberg When developing new classes/methods for a Java project, sometimes you want people to try out your new code, but you don't want to guarantee that it will be backward compatible in future releases. In this case, use something like the @Unstable annotatio
Gabriel Sanmartin I am creating a REST api where I am returning domain objects as JSON entities. So far I'm creating a controller where for each method I have to annotate it like this: @RequestMapping(value="/entity/{id}", produces = "application/json; charset
Gabriel Sanmartin I am creating a REST api where I am returning domain objects as JSON entities. So far I am creating a controller where I have to annotate each method like this: @RequestMapping(value="/entity/{id}", produces = "application/json; charset=utf-8
iceberg When developing new classes/methods for a Java project, sometimes you want people to try out your new code, but you don't want to guarantee that it will be backward compatible in future releases. In this case, use something like the @Unstable annotatio
Gabriel Sanmartin I am creating a REST api where I am returning domain objects as JSON entities. So far I'm creating a controller where for each method I have to annotate it like this: @RequestMapping(value="/entity/{id}", produces = "application/json; charset
Chris Smith If I annotate a class @Transactionallike this : @Transactional
class MyService { ... }
Is this the same as annotating all its methods @Transactional: class MyService {
@Transactional
void myFunction() { ... }
}
There are a few other thing
Dashnick Using C# - if I have a property of an object that, for example, returns the number of elements in that object's fields array, like NumColsthis: public string[][] Table { get; } // Jagged 2D Table
public int NumRows { get { return Table.Length; } } /
User130532: I am using Spring 3.0.2. I have two relatively simple bean definitions. One has a @PostConstruct(bean 'A') which fires a series of events that need to prepare the @DependsOn bean(bean 'B'). However, even though I said bean 'A' depends on bean 'B',
User130532: I am using Spring 3.0.2. I have two relatively simple bean definitions. One has a @PostConstruct(bean 'A') which fires a series of events that need to prepare the @DependsOn bean(bean 'B'). However, even though I said bean 'A' depends on bean 'B',
User130532: I am using Spring 3.0.2. I have two relatively simple bean definitions. One has a @PostConstruct(bean 'A') which fires a series of events that need to prepare the @DependsOn bean(bean 'B'). However, even though I said bean 'A' depends on bean 'B',
User130532: I am using Spring 3.0.2. I have two relatively simple bean definitions. One has a @PostConstruct(bean 'A') which fires a series of events that need to prepare the @DependsOn bean(bean 'B'). However, even though I said bean 'A' depends on bean 'B',
Vivin Paliath： I have a bean whose properties I want to access via reflection. I receive property name in string form. Beans have getter methods for their private fields. I'm currently using getDeclaredField(fieldName), using to access the field and setAccessi
Vivin Paliath： I have a bean whose properties I want to access via reflection. I receive property name in string form. Beans have getter methods for their private fields. I'm currently using getDeclaredField(fieldName), using to access the field and setAccessi
Vivin Paliath： I have a bean whose properties I want to access via reflection. I receive property name in string form. Beans have getter methods for their private fields. I'm currently using getDeclaredField(fieldName), using to access the field and setAccessi
Marty Pitt: In Java, the following class is given: public class MyClass {
private final Dependency dependency;
public MyClass(Dependency dependency)
{
this.dependency = dependency;
}
public void doWork()
{
// validate dependenc