Related
Vivin Paliath： I have a bean whose properties I want to access via reflection. I receive property name in string form. Beans have getter methods for their private fields. I'm currently using getDeclaredField(fieldName), using to access the field and setAccessi
Vivin Paliath： I have a bean whose properties I want to access via reflection. I receive property name in string form. Beans have getter methods for their private fields. I'm currently using getDeclaredField(fieldName), using to access the field and setAccessi
Asinkxcoswt I am confused about the scope of privatefields and fields of private staticabstract classes . For example, consider the following categories and pay attention to the fields validator, abstract class ValidComponent {
private static Validator val
Asinkxcoswt I am confused about the scope of privatefields and fields of private staticabstract classes . For example, consider the following categories and pay attention to the fields validator, abstract class ValidComponent {
private static Validator val
Matt Biner I've used the suggested private field syntax in JavaScript , but VS Code says it's a syntax error: The specific error is:Invalid character. ts(1127) How to make VS Code aware of private fields? Matt Biner reason VS Code uses TypeScript projects to p
Jose Lopez Garcia Following OOP best practices, it is best to use the following code: class Car {
private Driv driver;
public Driv Driver {
get { return driver; }
set { driver = value; }
}
}
Or this? class Car
{
public Dri
Matt Biner I've used the suggested private field syntax in JavaScript , but VS Code says it's a syntax error: The specific error is:Invalid character. ts(1127) How to make VS Code aware of private fields? Matt Biner reason VS Code uses TypeScript projects to p
Matt Biner I've used the suggested private field syntax in JavaScript , but VS Code says it's a syntax error: The specific error is:Invalid character. ts(1127) How to make VS Code aware of private fields? Matt Biner reason VS Code uses TypeScript projects to p
Matt Biner I've used the suggested private field syntax in JavaScript , but VS Code says it's a syntax error: The specific error is:Invalid character. ts(1127) How to make VS Code aware of private fields? Matt Biner reason VS Code uses TypeScript projects to p
benstpierre： I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wit
benstpierre： I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wit
Benstpierre ： I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wi
Davis I've encountered some surprising behavior with Hibernate Validator and JSF. I wonder if the behavior is a bug or a misunderstanding of my own expectations. I have this Facelets page: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//
Davis I've encountered some surprising behavior with Hibernate Validator and JSF. I wonder if the behavior is a bug or a misunderstanding of my own expectations. I have this Facelets page: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//
Davis I've encountered some surprising behavior with Hibernate Validator and JSF. I wonder if the behavior is a bug or a misunderstanding in my own expectations. I have this Facelets page: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//
Davis I've encountered some surprising behavior with Hibernate Validator and JSF. I wonder if the behavior is a bug or a misunderstanding in my own expectations. I have this Facelets page: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//
Desire PRG I've seen users in SO saying that protecting fields is bad because it can cause problems as the code grows. Please refer to the code below. public class Car {
private String modelName;
private int yearReleased;
//getters and setters
}
If
attaboy182 Item 15 in Effective Java states that it is recommended to use private final fields instead of public final fields in immutable objects, as it may prevent changes to the internal representation in later versions . I'm having trouble understanding th
Desire PRG I've seen users in SO saying that protecting fields is bad because it can cause problems as the code grows. Please refer to the code below. public class Car {
private String modelName;
private int yearReleased;
//getters and setters
}
If
Desire PRG I've seen users in SO saying that protecting fields is bad because it can cause problems as the code grows. Please refer to the code below. public class Car {
private String modelName;
private int yearReleased;
//getters and setters
}
If
attaboy182 Item 15 in Effective Java states that it is recommended to use private final fields instead of public final fields in immutable objects, as it may prevent changes to the internal representation in later versions . I'm having trouble understanding th
Desire PRG I've seen users in SO saying that protecting fields is bad because it can cause problems as the code grows. Please refer to the code below. public class Car {
private String modelName;
private int yearReleased;
//getters and setters
}
If
Desire PRG I've seen users in SO saying that protecting fields is bad because it can cause problems as the code grows. Please refer to the code below. public class Car {
private String modelName;
private int yearReleased;
//getters and setters
}
If
solo In Scala I see features like object private variables. From my not so rich Java background, I learned to turn everything off (make it private) and turn it on when necessary (provide an accessor). Scala introduces stricter access modifiers. Should I always
solo In Scala I see features like object private variables. From my not so rich Java background, I learned to turn everything off (make it private) and turn it on when necessary (provide an accessor). Scala introduces stricter access modifiers. Should I always
solo In Scala I see features like object private variables. From my not so rich Java background, I learned to turn everything off (make it private) and turn it on when necessary (provide an accessor). Scala introduces stricter access modifiers. Should I always
Josh R So I started doing unit testing and using Visual Studio 2012's built in framework called unit testing. I have some objects that I need to mock (I think..) There is a method that takes some parameters and returns an IEnumerable resource object that I wou
Josh R So I started doing unit testing and using Visual Studio 2012's built in framework called unit testing. I have some objects that I need to mock (I think..) There is a method that takes some parameters and returns an IEnumerable resource object that I wou
Josh R So I started doing unit testing and using Visual Studio 2012's built in framework called unit testing. I have some objects that I need to mock (I think..) There is a method that takes some parameters and returns an IEnumerable resource object that I wou