Related
Greg 82 Why in a template class std::numeric_limitsin C++ , digits(and other classes) are defined as (static const) fields of the class, but are min()again max()methods, since those methods just return garbled values? Thanks in advance. username Initialization
Jose Lopez Garcia Following OOP best practices, it is best to use the following code: class Car {
private Driv driver;
public Driv Driver {
get { return driver; }
set { driver = value; }
}
}
Or this? class Car
{
public Dri
benstpierre: I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wit
benstpierre: I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wit
Benstpierre : I have a simple question about Hibernate usage. I keep seeing people using JPA annotations in one of two ways, by annotating the fields of the class and also by annotating the get method of the corresponding bean. My question is the following: wi
c sharp user I'm new to SO and programming and learning with bits and pieces of technical (C#) jargon every day. After googling for a while, here is what I researchedmethods A method is a block of statements for code reusability and it also supports overloadin
c sharp user I'm new to SO and programming and learning with bits and pieces of technical (C#) jargon every day. After googling for a while, here is what I researchedmethods A method is a block of statements for code reusability and it also supports overloadin
c sharp user I'm new to SO and programming and learning with bits and pieces of technical (C#) jargon every day. After googling for a while, here is what I researchedmethods A method is a block of statements for code reusability and it also supports overloadin
c sharp user I'm new to SO and programming and learning with bits and pieces of technical (C#) jargon every day. After googling for a while, here is what I researchedmethods A method is a block of statements for code reusability and it also supports overloadin
Delier My class looks like this: public class Person
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Surname { get; set; }
public string Nickname{ get; set; }
public Person GetPersonData()
{
return new Person()
{
Tommy Lee Jones I have a class that EnemyI want to be the base class for all enemy types and also want to be a pure abstract class. At this point, all its members and methods should be shared by the derived class. In particular, there are methods that loadText
Marty Pitt: In Java, the following class is given: public class MyClass {
private final Dependency dependency;
public MyClass(Dependency dependency)
{
this.dependency = dependency;
}
public void doWork()
{
// validate dependenc
null Out of curiosity, I measured performance between static blocks and static method initializers. First, I implemented the above method in two separate java classes like this: First: class Dummy {
static java.util.List<Integer> lista = new java.util.Arra
null Out of curiosity, I measured performance between static blocks and static method initializers. First, I implemented the above method in two separate java classes like this: First: class Dummy {
static java.util.List<Integer> lista = new java.util.Arra
Marty Pitt: In Java, the following class is given: public class MyClass {
private final Dependency dependency;
public MyClass(Dependency dependency)
{
this.dependency = dependency;
}
public void doWork()
{
// validate dependenc
Marty Pitt: In Java, the following class is given: public class MyClass {
private final Dependency dependency;
public MyClass(Dependency dependency)
{
this.dependency = dependency;
}
public void doWork()
{
// validate dependenc
null Out of curiosity, I measured performance between static blocks and static method initializers. First, I implemented the above method in two separate java classes like this: First: class Dummy {
static java.util.List<Integer> lista = new java.util.Arra
Mike D While working on an open source project, I came across the declaration and implementation of the following C function: // FSNData.h
NSString *stringForMimeType(MimeType type);
@interface FSNData : NSObject
// All the expected objective-c property and i
Marwan Bshara I would like to know what is the difference between these two codes $('.stars li').each(function(i){
if(this.style.display !== 'none'){
this.style.display = 'none';
return false;
}
});
and this code $('.stars li').each(function(i){
Marwan Bshara I would like to know what is the difference between these two codes $('.stars li').each(function(i){
if(this.style.display !== 'none'){
this.style.display = 'none';
return false;
}
});
and this code $('.stars li').each(function(i){
Marwan Bshara I would like to know what is the difference between these two codes $('.stars li').each(function(i){
if(this.style.display !== 'none'){
this.style.display = 'none';
return false;
}
});
and this code $('.stars li').each(function(i){
Space Marine 104 I can't find a good way to make this DRY in .Net Core. (don't repeat yourself). How to do this so as not to repeat most of the logic? Here are two ways: public static string GetCategory(this Enum val)
{
CategoryAttribute[] attr
Space Marine 104 I can't find a good way to make this DRY in .Net Core. (don't repeat yourself). How to do this so as not to repeat most of the logic? Here are two ways: public static string GetCategory(this Enum val)
{
CategoryAttribute[] attr
Space Marine 104 I can't find a good way to make this DRY in .Net Core. (don't repeat yourself). How to do this so as not to repeat most of the logic? Here are two ways: public static string GetCategory(this Enum val)
{
CategoryAttribute[] attr
Matthew Consider the following three C++ programs: program 1 struct base{
virtual ~base() =0;
};
struct derived: public base{
~derived();
};
derived::~derived(){}
int main(){}
program 2 struct base{
virtual ~base() =0;
};
struct derived: public base
Matthew Consider the following three C++ programs: program 1 struct base{
virtual ~base() =0;
};
struct derived: public base{
~derived();
};
derived::~derived(){}
int main(){}
program 2 struct base{
virtual ~base() =0;
};
struct derived: public base
username My question refers to: Using Lambda Expressions with Private Methods Now that lambda functions are part of C++, you can use them to tidy up a class's interface. In C++, how does lambda usage compare to private methods? Are there better alternatives to
Matthew Consider the following three C++ programs: program 1 struct base{
virtual ~base() =0;
};
struct derived: public base{
~derived();
};
derived::~derived(){}
int main(){}
program 2 struct base{
virtual ~base() =0;
};
struct derived: public base
uzlxxxx Suppose I have a class with multiple properties, but only need some of them for object construction. The values of the remaining properties depend on these public properties. However, I still want to access the value of the rest of the properties using