Related
innocent bystander Imagine the following simplified code: #include <iostream>
void foo(const int& x) { do_something_with(x); }
int main() { foo(42); return 0; }
(1) Besides optimization, what happens when 42 is passed to foo? Does the compiler stick 42 somew
innocent bystander Imagine the following simplified code: #include <iostream>
void foo(const int& x) { do_something_with(x); }
int main() { foo(42); return 0; }
(1) Besides optimization, what happens when 42 is passed to foo? Does the compiler stick 42 somew
innocent bystander Imagine the following simplified code: #include <iostream>
void foo(const int& x) { do_something_with(x); }
int main() { foo(42); return 0; }
(1) Besides optimization, what happens when 42 is passed to foo? Does the compiler stick 42 somew
some development Suppose I have the following schema for later use $ref: "schemas": {
"Order": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64"
},
"petI
innocent bystander Imagine the following simplified code: #include <iostream>
void foo(const int& x) { do_something_with(x); }
int main() { foo(42); return 0; }
(1) Besides optimization, what happens when 42 is passed to foo? Does the compiler stick 42 somew
innocent bystander Imagine the following simplified code: #include <iostream>
void foo(const int& x) { do_something_with(x); }
int main() { foo(42); return 0; }
(1) Besides optimization, what happens when 42 is passed to foo? Does the compiler stick 42 somew
some development Suppose I have the following schema for later use $ref: "schemas": {
"Order": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"id": {
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64"
},
"petI
Sergio Romero We are dealing with a lot of legacy WinForms code and are slowly refactoring, breaking down dependencies, implementing the MVP pattern and moving logic from forms and user controls into the presenter. We've added Castle Windsor, which creates a V
Brinto In the current code, I use ref to change TextInputthe style of a component that uses a function in a method setNativeProps. class RegisterScreen extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super (props)
this.state = {
border
Brinto In the current code, I use ref to change TextInputthe style of a component that uses a function in a method setNativeProps. class RegisterScreen extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super (props)
this.state = {
border
JS Pretty new to C#, coming from a C++ background a long time ago, so I seem to be having trouble transitioning from pointers to refs in C#. I have a class (EColour) created with the constructor shown. I assign (or at least try to) a reference to cellTemplate
Brinto In the current code, I use ref to change TextInputthe style of a component that uses a function in a method setNativeProps. class RegisterScreen extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super (props)
this.state = {
border
Brinto In the current code, I use ref to change TextInputthe style of a component that uses a function in a method setNativeProps. class RegisterScreen extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super (props)
this.state = {
border
Sergio Romero We are dealing with a lot of legacy WinForms code and are slowly refactoring, breaking down dependencies, implementing the MVP pattern and moving logic from forms and user controls into the presenter. We've added Castle Windsor, which creates a V
Brinto In the current code, I use ref to change TextInputthe style of a component that uses a function in a method setNativeProps. class RegisterScreen extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super (props)
this.state = {
border
Brinto In the current code, I use ref to change TextInputthe style of a component that uses a function in a method setNativeProps. class RegisterScreen extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super (props)
this.state = {
border
Bulgari boy I'm a little confused about this because I've read about an int[] array, even though int is a primitive type, since it's an array, it's a reference type variable. What is the difference between such methods: public static void ChangeSomething(ref i
Bulgari boy I'm a little confused about this because I've read about an int[] array, even though int is a primitive type, since it's an array, it's a reference type variable. What is the difference between such methods: public static void ChangeSomething(ref i
Hussein Zawawi: The output of the following code is 123because substringfrom beginIndex to EndIndex-1. However, I'm surprised how this is understood as 3(int) charhere , since substringthere are two integers. What is the concept behind this? String x = "12345"
Hussein Zawawi: The output of the following code is 123because substringfrom beginIndex to EndIndex-1. However, I'm surprised how this is understood as 3(int) charhere , since substringthere are two integers. What is the concept behind this? String x = "12345"
Salvador Dali: Suppose I want to calculate the following f(f(...f(x)..). Basically, many functions themselves. Currently, I am doing the following to achieve this result (and return all intermediate steps): def iterator(function, x, n=4):
x = float(x)
Salvador Dali: Suppose I want to calculate the following f(f(...f(x)..). Basically, many functions themselves. Currently, I am doing the following to achieve this result (and return all intermediate steps): def iterator(function, x, n=4):
x = float(x)
salad I'm not sure if this is possible, but I'm trying to create a Python program to identify polynomials and identify all their properties. I'm trying to make a function similar to a switch() function, and I'm going to create hundreds of functions around each
Seebach 1 Can I pass methods as arguments on python? I want to do something like if anything is an instance of an object with a foo method: def access_to(class=anything, method="foo"): return class.method (Note that obviously the Anything instance has no attri
8th Borges responsesIn pyen, the thin library for music data returns a dictionary in this way: {u'id': u'AR6SPRZ1187FB4958B', u'name': u'Wilco'}
I am looping and printing the artists: response = en.get('artist/search', artist_location='Chicago')
artists = re
salad I'm not sure if this is possible, but I'm trying to create a Python program to identify polynomials and identify all their properties. I'm trying to make a function similar to a switch() function, and I'm going to create hundreds of functions around each
Salvador Dali Suppose I want to calculate the following f(f(...f(x)..). Basically, many functions themselves. Currently, I am doing the following to achieve this result (and return all intermediate steps): def iterator(function, x, n=4):
x = float(x)
a
Salvador Dali: Suppose I want to calculate the following f(f(...f(x)..). Basically, many functions themselves. Currently, I am doing the following to achieve this result (and return all intermediate steps): def iterator(function, x, n=4):
x = float(x)
salad I'm not sure if this is possible, but I'm trying to create a Python program to identify polynomials and identify all their properties. I'm trying to make a function similar to a switch() function, and I'm going to create hundreds of functions around each