Related
gurga durgan I've seen a few things on these lines lately, and after a lot of searching, I haven't found an answer that directly addresses this issue. If I have the following code: class Foo {
const char *some_string;
Foo()
{
some_string =
gurga durgan I've seen a few things on these lines lately, and after a lot of searching, I haven't found an answer that directly addresses this issue. If I have the following code: class Foo {
const char *some_string;
Foo()
{
some_string =
gurga durgan I've seen a few things on these lines lately, and after a lot of searching, I haven't found an answer that directly addresses this issue. If I have the following code: class Foo {
const char *some_string;
Foo()
{
some_string =
galaxy From what I understand, the following code works like this: char* cptr = "Hello World";
"Hello World" is located in .rodataan area of program memory. A string literal "Hello World"returns a pointer to the base address of the string or the address of th
galaxy From what I understand, the following code works like this: char* cptr = "Hello World";
"Hello World" is located in .rodataan area of program memory. A string literal "Hello World"returns a pointer to the base address of the string or the address of th
galaxy From what I understand, the following code works like this: char* cptr = "Hello World";
"Hello World" is located in .rodataan area of program memory. A string literal "Hello World"returns a pointer to the base address of the string or the address of th
galaxy From what I understand, the following code works like this: char* cptr = "Hello World";
"Hello World" is located in .rodataan area of program memory. A string literal "Hello World"returns a pointer to the base address of the string or the address of th
galaxy From what I understand, the following code works like this: char* cptr = "Hello World";
"Hello World" is located in .rodataan area of program memory. A string literal "Hello World"returns a pointer to the base address of the string or the address of th
galaxy From what I understand, the following code works like this: char* cptr = "Hello World";
"Hello World" is located in .rodataan area of program memory. A string literal "Hello World"returns a pointer to the base address of the string or the address of th
galaxy From what I understand, the following code works like this: char* cptr = "Hello World";
"Hello World" is located in .rodataan area of program memory. A string literal "Hello World"returns a pointer to the base address of the string or the address of th
Satantahan I'm just starting to learn c++ (so please excuse my clumsy query). Here is some code I wrote as an exercise: #include<iostream>
int main()
{
using namespace std;
int foo;
cin >> foo;
int bar;
cin >> bar;
cout << "foo plus
Wu Guoqiang Here 's an example of a C++ Primer : a function declared as :count() int count(const string & a, char b);
Also called: count("abcde", 'a')
it works. This "abcde"is a string literal and is passed to count()as const string &. But at the same time t
Wu Kun Here 's an example of a C++ Primer : a function declared as :count() int count(const string & a, char b);
Also called: count("abcde", 'a')
it works. This "abcde"is a string literal and is passed to count()as const string &. But at the same time this c
Wu Guoqiang Here 's an example of a C++ Primer : a function declared as :count() int count(const string & a, char b);
Also called: count("abcde", 'a')
it works. This "abcde"is a string literal and is passed to count()as const string &. But at the same time t
Wu Guoqiang Here 's an example of a C++ Primer : a function declared as :count() int count(const string & a, char b);
Also called: count("abcde", 'a')
it works. This "abcde"is a string literal and is passed to count()as const string &. But at the same time t
Wu Guoqiang Here 's an example of a C++ Primer : a function declared as :count() int count(const string & a, char b);
Also called: count("abcde", 'a')
it works. This "abcde"is a string literal and is passed to count()as const string &. But at the same time t
Mark As you can probably guess from the title, I'd like to understand exactly what happens when std::string is passed as a const reference to a function, because earlier today, I ran into a few situations that I didn't quite understand. Here is some code: #inc
Mark As you can probably guess from the title, I'd like to understand exactly what happens when std::string is passed as a const reference to a function, because earlier today, I ran into a few situations that I didn't quite understand. Here is some code: #inc
Mark As you can probably guess from the title, I'd like to understand exactly what happens when std::string is passed as a const reference to a function, because earlier today, I ran into a few situations that I didn't quite understand. Here is some code: #inc
Mark As you can probably guess from the title, I'd like to understand exactly what happens when std::string is passed as a const reference to a function, because earlier today, I ran into a few situations that I didn't quite understand. Here is some code: #inc
Mark As you can probably guess from the title, I'd like to understand exactly what happens when std::string is passed as a const reference to a function, because earlier today, I ran into a few situations that I didn't quite understand. Here is some code: #inc
Bernard Typically, I would return a std::stringfrom a function , because returning a const char*would require the caller to provide an output memory buffer, which is not resizable. But const char*does it work if it is returned from a string literal ? const cha
Bernard Typically, I would return a std::stringfrom a function because returning a const char*would require the caller to provide an output memory buffer, which is not resizable. But const char*does it work if it is returned from a string literal ? const char*
Bernard Typically, I would return a std::stringfrom a function because returning a const char*would require the caller to provide an output memory buffer, which is not resizable. But const char*does it work if it is returned from a string literal ? const char*
Scorpio I was trying to create a smart pointer and stumbled upon the code below. Since I'm fairly new to C++, I also had to get used to its syntax. You can see below the most important part of the code, which contains a reference counter class with a member va
RobertS supports Monica Cellio My question is actually simple for those who might know about it, but I'm asking because I don't know the technique yet. What is the reason for initializing or assigning an empty string literal to a pointer in C charor a pointer
RobertS supports Monica Cellio My question is actually simple for those who might know about it, but I'm asking because I don't know the technique yet. What is the reason for initializing or assigning an empty string literal to a pointer in C charor a pointer
RobertS supports Monica Cellio My question is actually simple for those who might know about it, but I'm asking because I don't know the technique yet. What is the reason for initializing or assigning an empty string literal to a pointer in C charor a pointer
RobertS supports Monica Cellio My question is actually simple for those who might know about it, but I'm asking because I don't know the technique yet. What is the reason for initializing or assigning an empty string literal to a pointer in C charor a pointer