Related
Sion0 Sorry for possible repetition. I don't know how to google it. Is it possible to repeat fields in the initializer list of a const constructor? example: const struct first _first = {
.value = 1,
.value = 2, /* same field again */
};
const struct s
Sion0 Sorry for possible repetition. I don't know how to google it. Is it possible to repeat fields in the initializer list of a const constructor? example: const struct first _first = {
.value = 1,
.value = 2, /* same field again */
};
const struct s
Sion0 Sorry for possible repetition. I don't know how to google it. Is it possible to repeat fields in the initializer list of a const constructor? example: const struct first _first = {
.value = 1,
.value = 2, /* same field again */
};
const struct s
Akshit Bhalla In the example given here on the reactnativeexpress website , the count variable is initialized using instead of the constructor.state = {count: 0} In the official Facebook documentation here , they say Generally, you should initialize the state
Alcan virus When I try to initialize the state in the component it gives me SyntaxError: Unexpected token constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
isFromDatePicked = false,
isToDatePicked = false,
markedDates = {},
}
username For the past hour, I've been trying to initialize "one" card in Solitaire. Everything works fine, but when trying to add a card to the deck, I get a "null reference exception" error. I created a card with values 1 and 12 (suit value) and tried to add
Akshit Bhalla In the example given here on the reactnativeexpress website , the count variable is initialized using instead of the constructor.state = {count: 0} In the official Facebook documentation here , they say Generally, you should initialize the state
Alcan virus When I try to initialize the state in the component it gives me SyntaxError: Unexpected token constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
isFromDatePicked = false,
isToDatePicked = false,
markedDates = {},
}
Alcan virus When I try to initialize the state in the component it gives me SyntaxError: Unexpected token constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
isFromDatePicked = false,
isToDatePicked = false,
markedDates = {},
}
Minosirag I upgraded from Django 1.10 to 1.11 and now both models I was using before were causing errors. They are there are only two models ManyToManyFieldwhich include one related_nameproperty. I have a ManyToManyFieldfile without a related_nameand it works
Minosirag I upgraded from Django 1.10 to 1.11 and now both models I was using before were causing errors. They are there are only two models ManyToManyFieldwhich include one related_nameproperty. I have a ManyToManyFieldfile without a related_nameand it works
Nason: I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the c
Nason I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the co
Nason I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the co
Nason: I have the following class. public class StatusCategory
{
@JsonProperty("key")
private final String m_key = null;
public String getKey()
{
return(m_key);
}
}
What -keepoptions are there to ensure that Proguard doesn't delete the c
Realazzi I ran into a strange problem when trying to upgrade to C++17. The problem is that something changed in C++17 (and I'm not sure what) that makes list-initialization different in the case of default constructors. I tried searching https://en.cppreferenc
crisron Consider the following code: #include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class A
{
public:
int a;
A(): a(5)
{
cout << "Constructor\n";
}
A(const A &b)
{
a = b.a;
cout
low If I have a Carclass like this: class Car
{
/**
* @var string $model
*/
private $model;
/**
* Makes a new car based on a model
*
* @param string $model Initializes the model
*/
public function __construct($mod
Christine S I've been trying to fully understand move semantics, but I'm having a problem because different examples show different things. Suppose we have a class Foo which has a string member str_. To define the move constructor, I should define it like this
Manvindra Singh Following this answer, it's OK to use the same name for member variables and constructor parameters. So, after doing some debugging, I found out why the following code doesn't work (the class's action member is never initialized, causing the sw
Manvindra Singh Following this answer, it's OK to use the same name for member variables and constructor parameters. So, after doing some debugging, I found out why the following code doesn't work (the class's action member is never initialized, causing the sw
Realazzi I ran into a strange problem when trying to upgrade to C++17. The problem is that something changed in C++17 (and I'm not sure what) that makes list-initialization different in the case of default constructors. I tried searching https://en.cppreferenc
outpost A class Foohas only one default constructor and one copy constructor. A vector of size 10 initialized by an object of type is Foosomehow incorrect. #include <iostream>
#include <vector>
class Foo
{
public:
Foo() = default; // Error1
Maddie I am writing a unit test for a spring application using Mockito, the following is the unit test for a service class. Service level: @Service
class MyServiceImpl implements MyService{
@Autowired
private ExternalService externalService;
MySer
cat When running this code, I get a System.TypeInitializationException at line 9 where I try to populate the list of generics in the static constructor of the class. using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
namespace ConsoleApplication5_static_construc
Christine S I've been trying to fully understand move semantics, but I'm having a problem because different examples show different things. Suppose we have a class Foo which has a string member str_. To define the move constructor, I should define it like this
Christine S I've been trying to fully understand move semantics, but I'm having a problem because different examples show different things. Suppose we have a class Foo which has a string member str_. To define the move constructor, I should define it like this
Maddie I am writing a unit test for a spring application using Mockito, the following is the unit test for a service class. Service level: @Service
class MyServiceImpl implements MyService{
@Autowired
private ExternalService externalService;
MySer
Manvindra Singh Following this answer, it's OK to use the same name for member variables and constructor parameters. So, after doing some debugging, I found out why the following code doesn't work (the class's action member is never initialized, causing the sw