Related
Cheshire: Here is my main class to initialize and start 5 different threads: public class Server implements Runnable {
Server1 server1;
Thread server1Thread;
public Server() {}
@Override
public void run() {
server1 = new Server1()
Cheshire: Here is my main class to initialize and start 5 different threads: public class Server implements Runnable {
Server1 server1;
Thread server1Thread;
public Server() {}
@Override
public void run() {
server1 = new Server1()
Cheshire: Here is my main class to initialize and start 5 different threads: public class Server implements Runnable {
Server1 server1;
Thread server1Thread;
public Server() {}
@Override
public void run() {
server1 = new Server1()
StvnBrkdll Below is a simple Java program. It has a counter called "cnt" which is incremented and then added to a list called "monitor". "cnt" is incremented by multiple threads, and values are added to "monitor" by multiple threads. At the end of the method "
StvnBrkdll Below is a simple Java program. It has a counter called "cnt" which is incremented and then added to a list called "monitor". "cnt" is incremented by multiple threads, and values are added to "monitor" by multiple threads. At the end of the method "
StvnBrkdll Below is a simple Java program. It has a counter called "cnt" which is incremented and then added to a list called "monitor". "cnt" is incremented by multiple threads, and values are added to "monitor" by multiple threads. At the end of the method "
StvnBrkdll Below is a simple Java program. It has a counter called "cnt" which is incremented and then added to a list called "monitor". "cnt" is incremented by multiple threads, and values are added to "monitor" by multiple threads. At the end of the method "
Ion 20 I'm learning synchronizedcode blocks and .wait()/or methods in Java and am having a .notify()hard time understanding how they interact in a producer-consumer setup. The same instance of the class below is passed to two threads; one thread runs the produ
username I'm just starting with Java synchronization and I have a small problem. is this method: public synchronized void method() {
// ... do staff ...
}
equal: public void method() {
synchronize(this) {
// ... do staff ...
}
}
polystyre
username I'm just starting with Java synchronization and I have a small problem. is this method: public synchronized void method() {
// ... do staff ...
}
equal: public void method() {
synchronize(this) {
// ... do staff ...
}
}
polystyre
IAmYourFaja : I saw this in the version of Heinz Kabutz's Java Expert Newsletter , and while the rest (and indeed all) of Dr. Kabutz's article is well explained and detailed, he seems to gloss over what this code does, or More importantly, it means: public cla
sky: I realize that synchronized blocks provided in Java are basically implementations of reentrant mutexes. However, are synchronized blocks atomic? So, how to handle interruption of a thread currently executing in a synchronized block - does it simply releas
David K: Say I'm executing a block of code synchronizedinside some thread , and inside that synchronizedblock I call a method that spawns another thread to handle the synchronized block of code that requires the same lock as the first method. So, in pseudo-Jav
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
IAmYourFaja : I saw this in the version of Heinz Kabutz's Java Expert Newsletter , and while the rest (and indeed all) of Dr. Kabutz's article is well explained and detailed, he seems to gloss over what this code does, or More importantly, it means: public cla
Sam: I only use the following code for guaranteed startTimevariable sets: public class Processor
{
private Date startTime;
public void doProcess()
{
if(startTime == null)
synchronized(this)
{
if(st
David K: Suppose I'm executing a block of code synchronizedinside some thread , and within that synchronizedblock I call a method that spawns another thread to handle the block of synchronized code that requires the same lock as the first method. So, in pseudo
sky: I realize that synchronized blocks provided in Java are basically implementations of reentrant mutexes. However, are synchronized blocks atomic? So, how to handle interruption of a thread currently executing in a synchronized block - does it simply releas
it's me I need some help making sure I understand synchronized blocks. Suppose the following example: public class ThreadStarter {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Queue queueObject = new Queue();
ThreadA thread1 = new ThreadA(que
JavaUser201 I am trying to understand the concept of synchronization on objects. Using the example from the Java Cert Book, can you help me understand the difference in behavior between the following two pieces of code (one where we are synchronizing with the
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
Eaton Emmerich I have some old code with many concurrency issues. The code uses sockets to connect to the server. There are multiple conditions on whether the socket is connected, this is achieved by using boolean variables (willy nilly between multiple thread
it's me I need some help making sure I understand synchronized blocks. Suppose the following example: public class ThreadStarter {
public static void main(String[] args) {
Queue queueObject = new Queue();
ThreadA thread1 = new ThreadA(que
JavaUser201 I am trying to understand the concept of synchronization on objects. Using the example from the Java Cert Book, can you help me understand the difference in behavior between the following two pieces of code (one where we are synchronizing with the