Related
cresol Compile with clang without warning. typedef struct {
int option;
int value;
} someType;
someType *init(someType *ptr) {
*ptr = (someType) {
.option = ptr->option | ANOTHEROPT,
.value = 1
};
return ptr;
}
int main()
{
someType *typ
cresol Compile with clang without warning. typedef struct {
int option;
int value;
} someType;
someType *init(someType *ptr) {
*ptr = (someType) {
.option = ptr->option | ANOTHEROPT,
.value = 1
};
return ptr;
}
int main()
{
someType *typ
cresol Compile with clang without warning. typedef struct {
int option;
int value;
} someType;
someType *init(someType *ptr) {
*ptr = (someType) {
.option = ptr->option | ANOTHEROPT,
.value = 1
};
return ptr;
}
int main()
{
someType *typ
Function Is pass-by-value cast pointer valid in C? If not why does this work? #include <stdio.h>
typedef struct
{
int size;
char* str;
} MY_STRUCT;
void print_my_struct_prt(MY_STRUCT* mstrct)
{
printf("%s%d%s%s\n", "size: ", mstrct->size, " c
bee rope I can't imagine this isn't a duplicate yet, but I can't find the answer easily, as more complex scenarios specific to C++ seem to dominate discussion 0 . Is it legal to take a temporary address constructed in the parameter list of a function call in C
bee rope I can't imagine this isn't a duplicate yet, but I can't find the answer easily, as more complex scenarios specific to C++ seem to dominate discussion 0 . Is it legal to take a temporary address constructed in the parameter list of a function call in C
bee rope I can't imagine this isn't a duplicate yet, but I can't find the answer easily, as more complex scenarios specific to C++ seem to dominate discussion 0 . Is it legal to take a temporary address constructed in the parameter list of a function call in C
bee rope I can't imagine this isn't a duplicate yet, but I can't find the answer easily, as more complex scenarios specific to C++ seem to dominate discussion 0 . Is it legal to take a temporary address constructed in the parameter list of a function call in C
Cheeseman 69 Here is structwhat I have: typedef struct
{
float r, g, b;
} color_t;
I want to pass a compound literal of this structas a parameter to a function like this: void printcolor(color_t c)
{
printf("color is : %f %f %f\n", c.r, c.g, c.b);
}
bee rope I can't imagine this isn't a duplicate yet, but I can't find the answer easily, as more complex scenarios specific to C++ seem to dominate discussion 0 . Is it legal to take a temporary address constructed in the parameter list of a function call in C
bee rope I can't imagine this isn't a duplicate yet, but I can't find the answer easily, as more complex scenarios specific to C++ seem to dominate discussion 0 . Is it legal to take a temporary address constructed in the parameter list of a function call in C
I am Islam I ran into a situation in Go and I couldn't find any solution. The problem starts with the following code: graph := chart.BarChart{
Title: "Remote#1 Bar Chart",
Background: chart.Style{
Padding: chart.Box{
Top: 40,
Thing I have a function: function hello(param){ console.log('param is '+param); }
and two phones. First: hello(123)
second: var a=123; hello(a);
Is there any possible way to tell from inside the hellofunction whether it was passed paramas a varor as a liter
Thing I have a function: function hello(param){ console.log('param is '+param); }
and two phones. First: hello(123)
second: var a=123; hello(a);
Is there any possible way to tell from inside the hellofunction whether it was passed paramas a varor as a liter
Thing I have a function: function hello(param){ console.log('param is '+param); }
and two phones. First: hello(123)
second: var a=123; hello(a);
Is there any possible way to tell from inside the hellofunction whether it was passed paramas a varor as a liter
some names I'm trying to write a macro that returns a value of literal type passed as a type parameter, which fails to compile if the parameter is not a literal type. Here are some examples: def literalValue[SC <: String] = //...
literalValue["AB"] // returns
Thing I have a function: function hello(param){ console.log('param is '+param); }
and two phones. First: hello(123)
second: var a=123; hello(a);
Is there any possible way to tell from inside the hellofunction whether it was passed paramas a varor as a liter
Thing I have a function: function hello(param){ console.log('param is '+param); }
and two phones. First: hello(123)
second: var a=123; hello(a);
Is there any possible way to tell from inside the hellofunction whether it was passed paramas a varor as a liter
Rays I am trying to get this code to compile: use std::collections::HashMap;
#[derive(PartialEq, Eq, Hash, Clone)]
struct Key<'a> {
v: &'a str
}
fn make_key_iter(s: &str) -> Box<Iterator<Item = Key>> {
Box::new(s.split('.').map(|e| Key { v: e }))
}
Goertzenator I understand how lifetime parameters apply to functions and structs, but what does it mean for traits to have lifetime parameters ? Is it a shortcut to introduce lifecycle parameters into its methods, or something else? Shepmaster If your trait ha
AnArrayOfFunctions Is the lifetime of a function parameter equal to an unnamed temporary variable passed as an "rvalue" reference (equal to an expression called a function)? My "gcc" compiler says it does. But I'd like to see an actual standard document that a
Goertzenator I understand how lifetime parameters apply to functions and structs, but what does it mean for traits to have lifetime parameters ? Is it a shortcut to introduce lifecycle parameters into its methods, or something else? Shepmaster If your trait ha
humble I have the following code: struct Callable<P> {
callable: Box<FnMut(&P)>,
}
struct Parameters<'a> {
text: &'a str,
}
struct Context<'a> {
call: Callable<Parameters<'a>>,
}
Callableis something that can be called with a reference type para
Ricky I'm working on Rust's rustling exercise and came up with a solution that threads1.rslooks like this : struct JobStatus {
jobs_completed: u32,
}
fn main() {
let status = Arc::new(Mutex::new(JobStatus { jobs_completed: 0 }));
let status_shared
Goertzenator I understand how lifetime parameters apply to functions and structs, but what does it mean for traits to have lifetime parameters ? Is it a shortcut to introduce lifecycle parameters into its methods, or something else? Shepmaster If your trait ha
Ricky I'm working on Rust's rustling exercise and came up with a solution that threads1.rslooks like this : struct JobStatus {
jobs_completed: u32,
}
fn main() {
let status = Arc::new(Mutex::new(JobStatus { jobs_completed: 0 }));
let status_shared
AnArrayOfFunctions Is the lifetime of a function parameter equal to an unnamed temporary variable passed as an "rvalue" reference (equal to an expression called a function)? My "gcc" compiler says it does. But I'd like to see an actual standard document that a
Goertzenator I understand how lifetime parameters apply to functions and structs, but what does it mean for traits to have lifetime parameters ? Is it a shortcut to introduce lifecycle parameters into its methods, or something else? Shepmaster If your trait ha
AnArrayOfFunctions Is the lifetime of a function parameter equal to an unnamed temporary variable passed as an "rvalue" reference (equal to an expression called a function)? My "gcc" compiler says it does. But I'd like to see an actual standard document statin