Related
Abaric I want to check if anything in Map, HashMap, ArrayList, List or Collections is empty or empty? I have this, but it doesn't work when I pass the map: protected static <T extends Collection, Map> boolean isCollectionMapNullOrEmpty(final T c) {
if (c ==
Zac Delventhal Using traditional objects in JavaScript, it's easy to check if it's null using :Object.keys const emptyObj = {};
console.log(Object.keys(emptyObj).length === 0); // true, i.e. "empty"
const populatedObj = { foo: 'bar' };
console.log(Object.key
Zac Delventhal Using traditional objects in JavaScript, it's easy to check if it's null using :Object.keys const emptyObj = {};
console.log(Object.keys(emptyObj).length === 0); // true, i.e. "empty"
const populatedObj = { foo: 'bar' };
console.log(Object.key
Zac Delventhal Using traditional objects in JavaScript, it's easy to check if it's null using :Object.keys const emptyObj = {};
console.log(Object.keys(emptyObj).length === 0); // true, i.e. "empty"
const populatedObj = { foo: 'bar' };
console.log(Object.key
Zac Delventhal Using traditional objects in JavaScript, it's easy to check if it's null using :Object.keys const emptyObj = {};
console.log(Object.keys(emptyObj).length === 0); // true, i.e. "empty"
const populatedObj = { foo: 'bar' };
console.log(Object.key
Zac Delventhal Using traditional objects in JavaScript, it's easy to check if it's null using :Object.keys const emptyObj = {};
console.log(Object.keys(emptyObj).length === 0); // true, i.e. "empty"
const populatedObj = { foo: 'bar' };
console.log(Object.key
Vikrant I have two ways to check if the list is empty if (CollectionUtils.isNotEmpty(listName))
and if (listName != null && listName.size() != 0)
My arches tell me that the former is better than the latter. But I think the latter is better. Can anyone clari
Vikrant I have two ways to check if the list is empty if (CollectionUtils.isNotEmpty(listName))
and if (listName != null && listName.size() != 0)
My arches tell me that the former is better than the latter. But I think the latter is better. Can anyone clari
Vikrant I have two ways to check if the list is empty if (CollectionUtils.isNotEmpty(listName))
and if (listName != null && listName.size() != 0)
My arches tell me that the former is better than the latter. But I think the latter is better. Can anyone clari
Vikrant I have two ways to check if the list is empty if (CollectionUtils.isNotEmpty(listName))
and if (listName != null && listName.size() != 0)
My arches tell me that the former is better than the latter. But I think the latter is better. Can anyone clari
Rappen I'm using these kinds of dictionaries, which can be empty, completely empty, collection_aor contain a single level of nested dictionaries that may be empty. It won't have more levels. collection_a = {}
collection_b = {"test": {}}
print is_empty(collect
Rappen I'm using these kinds of dictionaries, which can be empty, completely empty, collection_aor contain a single level of nested dictionaries that may be empty. It won't have more levels. collection_a = {}
collection_b = {"test": {}}
print is_empty(collect
Rappen I'm using these kinds of dictionaries, which can be empty, completely empty, collection_aor contain a single level of nested dictionaries that may be empty. It won't have more levels. collection_a = {}
collection_b = {"test": {}}
print is_empty(collect
Zapnologica I had a colleague of mine told me the following code was incorrect and would crash if my variable was null: List<FSKUser> users = null;
if (users == null || users.Count() == 0)
{
return false;
}
Obviously =nullthis is just for testing purposes
Rappen I'm using these kinds of dictionaries, which can be empty, completely empty, collection_aor contain a single level of nested dictionaries that may be empty. It won't have more levels. collection_a = {}
collection_b = {"test": {}}
print is_empty(collect
Rappen I'm using these kinds of dictionaries, which can be empty, completely empty, collection_aor contain a single level of nested dictionaries that may be empty. It won't have more levels. collection_a = {}
collection_b = {"test": {}}
print is_empty(collect
Jamie: I've found this in my Laravel web app: @foreach($mentors as $mentor)
@foreach($mentor->intern as $intern)
<tr class="table-row-link" data-href="/werknemer/{!! $intern->employee->EmployeeId !!}">
<td>{{ $intern->employee->FirstNam
Jamie I've found this in my Laravel web app: @foreach($mentors as $mentor)
@foreach($mentor->intern as $intern)
<tr class="table-row-link" data-href="/werknemer/{!! $intern->employee->EmployeeId !!}">
<td>{{ $intern->employee->FirstName
Jamie: I've found this in my Laravel web app: @foreach($mentors as $mentor)
@foreach($mentor->intern as $intern)
<tr class="table-row-link" data-href="/werknemer/{!! $intern->employee->EmployeeId !!}">
<td>{{ $intern->employee->FirstNam
rookie encoder I have some data to run a map to display. Before that, I check if the data exists, and if so I loop through it and display it. The problem I'm having is that the second map breaks when it encounters an empty string. The array it loops over can b
sunny j I'm building an app and I want the contact information of the cleaner to be displayed in a UIButton if the cleaner is assigned to a job, otherwise the UIButton is not displayed. I have "Date" objects that have "cleaner" and "cleanerPhone" strings as pr
sunny j I'm building an app and I want to show the contact information of the cleaner in a UIButton if the cleaner is assigned to a job, otherwise not show that UIButton. I have "Date" objects that have "cleaner" and "cleanerPhone" strings as properties. I am
Florin M. if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(stringTest))
newString = stringTest; // newString is a string
else
newString = string.Empty;
Is there another (easy) way to achieve this? Jeff Rosen You need the Null-coalescence operator: newString
sunny j I'm building an app and I want the contact information of the cleaner to be displayed in a UIButton if the cleaner is assigned to a job, otherwise the UIButton is not displayed. I have "Date" objects that have "cleaner" and "cleanerPhone" strings as pr
sunny j I'm building an app and I want the contact information of the cleaner to be displayed in a UIButton if the cleaner is assigned to a job, otherwise the UIButton is not displayed. I have "Date" objects that have "cleaner" and "cleanerPhone" strings as pr
Cabrese After reading the data file, I need to convert some string values to Ints. The field may be empty, causing an error when trying to convert. Is there an easy way to check for null (or an appropriate value that can be converted to an integer) and just re
sunny j I am building an app and I want to show the contact information of the cleaner in a UIButton if the cleaner is assigned to a job, otherwise not show that UIButton. I have "Date" objects that have "cleaner" and "cleanerPhone" strings as properties. I am
Florin M. if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(stringTest))
newString = stringTest; // newString is a string
else
newString = string.Empty;
Is there another (easy) way to achieve this? Jeff Rosen You need the Null-coalescence operator: newString
sunny j I'm building an app and I want the contact information of the cleaner to be displayed in a UIButton if the cleaner is assigned to a job, otherwise the UIButton is not displayed. I have "Date" objects that have "cleaner" and "cleanerPhone" strings as pr