Related
Billpg A while ago I asked a question using this sample JS code... for (var myindex = 0; myindex < mylist.length; myindex += 1) {
var copyindex = myindex;
MyAsync(mylist[myindex], function () { alert(copyindex); });
}
(The answer is actually to call a
Bilger A while ago I asked a question using this sample JS code... for (var myindex = 0; myindex < mylist.length; myindex += 1) {
var copyindex = myindex;
MyAsync(mylist[myindex], function () { alert(copyindex); });
}
(The answer is actually to call a
Bilger A while ago I asked a question using this sample JS code... for (var myindex = 0; myindex < mylist.length; myindex += 1) {
var copyindex = myindex;
MyAsync(mylist[myindex], function () { alert(copyindex); });
}
(The answer is actually to call a
3 Is block scope sometimes the same as function scope ? I know that function scoping applies to everything inside a function , but can't figure out exactly what block scoping is . For Javascript, is it currently recommended let/ constreplaced varfor future mai
3 Is block scope sometimes the same as function scope ? I know that function scoping applies to everything inside a function , but can't figure out exactly what block scoping is . For Javascript, is it currently recommended let/ constreplaced varfor future mai
3 Is block scope sometimes the same as function scope ? I know that function scoping applies to everything inside a function , but can't figure out exactly what block scoping is . For Javascript, is it currently recommended let/ constreplaced varfor future mai
3 Is block scope sometimes the same as function scope ? I know that function scoping applies to everything inside a function , but can't figure out exactly what block scoping is . For Javascript, is it currently recommended let/ constreplaced varfor future mai
3 Is block scope sometimes the same as function scope ? I know that function scoping applies to everything inside a function , but can't figure out exactly what block scoping is . For Javascript, is it currently recommended let/ constreplaced varfor future mai
Johan Råde: When writing code in other languages, a block scope is sometimes created like this: statement
...
statement
{
statement
...
statement
}
statement
...
statement
One of the (many) purposes is to improve the readability of the code: to sh
Paul: this will compile class X
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
{
int a = 2;
}
{
int a = 3;
}
}
}
it won't class X
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
Herdev I'm having trouble using the Proxy() object in Javascript . This code works as expected when I pass in the target and there is no handler: const scope = new Proxy({a: 2, b: 2}, {});
with (scope) {
a + b;
}
However, it doesn't work when I pass in a
Paul: this will compile class X
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
{
int a = 2;
}
{
int a = 3;
}
}
}
it won't class X
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
username I have a method that takes different actions depending on the situation, so I want to be able to pass a block to the method and it will execute if the block is given. However, I am confused about the scope of the variable in the block passed in. E.g:
Khan I'm learning Swift, and since there are compilers available now on Linux, I installed it and tested some programs. I don't understand one thing. Why does this contrived example get errors during compilation? var x = 86;
if x <= 32 {
++x;
print(x)
stamp letStatements in ES2015 allow us to declare block-scoped variables, for example, the following code does what we want: let fs = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
fs.push(() => i);
}
console.log(fs.map(f => f())); // 0, 1, 2
However, it doesn't seem
p According to the C18 standard (6.7.9): If the declaration of an identifier has block scope , and the identifier has external or internal linkage , the declaration shall have no initializer for the identifier. I don't have any problem with block scope + exter
stamp letStatements in ES2015 allow us to declare block-scoped variables, for example, the following code does what we want: let fs = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
fs.push(() => i);
}
console.log(fs.map(f => f())); // 0, 1, 2
However, it doesn't seem
Herdev I'm having trouble using the Proxy() object in Javascript . This code works as expected when I pass in the target and there is no handler: const scope = new Proxy({a: 2, b: 2}, {});
with (scope) {
a + b;
}
However, it doesn't work when I pass in a
Herdev I'm having trouble using the Proxy() object in Javascript . This code works as expected when I pass in the target and there is no handler: const scope = new Proxy({a: 2, b: 2}, {});
with (scope) {
a + b;
}
However, it doesn't work when I pass in a
Herdev I'm having trouble using the Proxy() object in Javascript . This code works as expected when I pass in the target and there is no handler: const scope = new Proxy({a: 2, b: 2}, {});
with (scope) {
a + b;
}
However, it doesn't work when I pass in a
ARF I am trying to understand the meaning of block scope in C. I realize that identifiers defined in scope are not visible outside the scope, but what are the implications of doing block scoping at the instruction level? Does entering or exiting block scope im
username I have a method that takes different actions depending on the situation, so I want to be able to pass a block to the method and it will execute if the block is given. However, I am confused about the scope of the variable in the block passed in. E.g:
Phoenix I'm reading about function scope vs block scope. And learned that Javascript has functional scope. Now, when I think about it, all languages I know have function scope. I don't really know of any language that has block scope. Can you guys tell me some
Phoenix I'm reading about function scope vs block scope. And learned that Javascript has functional scope. Now, when I think about it, all languages I know have function scope. I don't really know of any language that has block scope. Can you guys tell me some
p According to the C18 standard (6.7.9): If the declaration of an identifier has block scope , and the identifier has external or internal linkage , the declaration shall have no initializer for the identifier. I don't have any problem with block scope + exter
Paul: this will compile class X
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
{
int a = 2;
}
{
int a = 3;
}
}
}
it won't class X
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
Johan Råde: When writing code in other languages, a block scope is sometimes created like this: statement
...
statement
{
statement
...
statement
}
statement
...
statement
One of the (many) purposes is to improve the readability of the code: to sh
p According to the C18 standard (6.7.9): If the declaration of an identifier has block scope , and the identifier has external or internal linkage , the declaration shall have no initializer for the identifier. I don't have any problem with block scope + exter
stamp letStatements in ES2015 allow us to declare block-scoped variables, for example, the following code does what we want: let fs = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
fs.push(() => i);
}
console.log(fs.map(f => f())); // 0, 1, 2
However, it doesn't seem